Submitted by Joe638NYC on Mon, 03/24/2008 - 4:21am.
|
 Heres the story from Forbes (3/21/08):
Sometimes
it pays to start a fight with the big guys. For some former Starbucks
baristas that pay is going to total over $100 million.
Judge
Patricia Y. Cowett of the Superior Court of the State of California
ruled in a class action suit Thursday that the Starbucks Corp. (nasdaq:
SBUX - news - people ) must pay 120,000 of its current and former
baristas the sum of $86.7 million, plus awards interest of 7%, for tip
pool money that the coffee retailer used to compensate shift
supervisors.
Under California state labor laws, it is legal for
employers to implement tip pools where employees are required to share
tips, but recipients of the pool share may not be owners, managers or
supervisors.
In the case of Chau vs. Starbucks the court ruled
that Starbucks illegally distributed tips from the tip pool to
compensate shift supervisors as well as baristas, expert espresso
makers, and the plaintiffs are entitled to an injunction that Seattle,
Wash.-based Starbucks no longer force employees to share their tips
with shift supervisors.
Jou Chau, Starbucks barista from 2003
through 2004, filed the lawsuit in October 2004, complaining that he
didn’t think it was fair to have to share tips with shift supervisors.
“Tips really help those receiving the lowest wages. I think Starbucks
should pay shift supervisors higher wages instead of making money from
the tip pool.”
After reading a few comments by Starbucks
employees I just couldn't hold back my anger of the stupidity of these
workers who consider themselves Team Members and Partners, Jesus, I can
call you sister and brother it doesn't mean we're related. This type of
shit goes on in Toys' R Us and Wal-Mart to name a few. Where the
corporations swindle the employees into thinking they are associates, a
team or partners.
Do
they even have a clue how stupid that idea is? If you are a partner at
Starbucks, why the hell would I leave you a tip, let alone the lower
level management. Geez, the general public are subsidizing the pay for
their employees. How stupid could we be, $2-4 for a coffee and then we
pay the employee too?
Wake up Starbucks workers, make your
partners your fellow employees and form a damn union and force this
giant multi-national piece of crap to reinvest in their partners, by
giving you all a set schedule, a honest days pay and access to
affordable medical for all their employees. Maybe even find a way for
them to reinvent themselves to attract new customers, instead of just
the overpriced coffee house that makes one feel obligated to tip.
My comment at Forbes:
I'm
sorry, but I worked in Deli's and Bagel Stores when I was younger and
there was no tip glass. The theory was that if there was a tip glass
that the customers would think you didn't get paid enough.
It
was a good theory. Starbucks should not use the customer to subsidize
their employee pay. They should give their workers an honest days pay.
You are not Baristas, team members or associates, you are just
employees/workers and numbers to
the Starbucks corporation who has a lawful duty to make a profit in each quarter to satisfy the demand of the investors.
Got
it, you work for Starbucks, they should pay you accordingly. I
personally hate the way Starbucks makes customers feel obligated to tip
someone who makes a cup of coffee, hell the way the brainwashed
employees speak as if they are partners, make me wonder why the hell
would I tip a multi-national chain store owner.
Think of it
PARTNERS. Tell Starbucks to give you all full time hours, access to
medical, the right of association and to freely form a union if so
desired. Then maybe you can start calling them partners.
You can learn more about Starbuck's infractions against worker by checking out the IWW, Industrial Workers of The World website and the Starbucks Union site.
Heres one recent story of note from IWW (1/29/08) :
E-Mail Action: Fortune Magazine, Stop Lying About Starbucks Being a 'Best Company to Work For'
by intexile
Andrew Serwer
Managing Editor
Fortune Magazine
1 Time Warner Center
New York, NY 10019
January 28, 2008
Dear Mr. Serwer,
I take serious issue with the erroneous information regarding Starbucks
in Fortune Magazine's 2008 '100 Best Companies to Work For'. I am
especially concerned about the reliability of Fortune given that the
IWW Starbucks Workers Union wrote you an open letter
before the 2007 '100 Best Companies to Work For' feature that pointed
out the very same misinformation which you proceeded to include once
again in the 2008 list.
The 2008 'Best Companies to Work For'
list claims that the most common hourly job at Starbucks is a
mysterious position called "Coordinator III" which takes in $37,390 per
year. Once again, the most common hourly job at Starbucks, by far, is a
position called "Barista" which likely takes in approximately $12,000
per year on average. The precise average pay for baristas is not known
since Starbucks refuses to make that information public.
Sphere: Related Content
Related Posts by Categories
corporate responsibility
- Take a look at the Men’s Wearhouse workers who will lose their job.
- Boston Verizon union members proactive in upcoming negotiations.
- Montreal,
Ca : Men's Waerhouse closing factory for higher profits and turning
it's back on 600 workers, tell the CEO how you feel
- Another appeal for stronger media accountability
- Boston: Stand with IBEW and CWA on March 13th in a practice picket against Verizon
- NY: Senator Schumer takes stand against Chinese made blood thinner, which killed 19 and injured hundreds
- NY: Support local workers on strike for 4 months against Germanys' leading tea producer
- Stop Big Media action alert, help Senate negate FCC ruling
- G.M. to shut 7th plant after American Axle strike
- Former Oakland Raider Dave Pear takes on NFL owners and the unions treatment of retired players
- Carhartt retraction- Some stuff is still made in the USA by union workers, heres where you can get them.
- Which stores get tainted meat? USDA should tell you!
- Video: Comcast Pays to Push Public out of Internet Debate
- Better tickle that Elmo cause hes out to kill
- The state of the media in the USA today
- Union members and community supporters stand in solidarity outside Verizon, who disgraced veteran Terry Skiest US flag
- Claiming ignorance, Verizon tolerated illegal alien work force through a subcontractor
- Drug Trade Group Spent $22M Lobbying
- Health Net ordered to pay $9 million after canceling cancer patient's policy
- Carhartt, Red Wing Shoes and more union news you may have missed, ideas, blurbs and dumbed down Americans
- Tell
the Senate Banking Committee to block Wal-Mart for good! With a dash of
Toxic product, health care, UAW, USW and Chinese product news included
- NC: The Human Cost of the poultry Industry by The Charlotte observer
- Your eating a clone and you don't even know it
- Insurance Cuts Off a Working Parents Kid Fighting For Life!
cost of living
Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Got a story you'd like to see posted here on UR? Please feel free to get a user name and password and share any related information with our growing online community.
login or register
Your donation will help keep UR a strong, vibrant community and a valuable resource for the labor movement.
Find out more about ads and donations on this site.
US Labor News from LabourStart
Joe's Union Review - The Anti-Union Blogspot
|