Submitted by Joe638NYC on Tue, 05/06/2008 - 7:59pm.
|
Who would have thunk it? Former Bush NLRB appointee now working for anti-union law firm.
For
quite some time the NLRB has been favoring employers, now former
Chairman Robert Battista can help exploit American workers, using laws
he helped create.
According to American Rights at Work (5/5/08):
Breaking: Battista Now Busting Unions For Profit
Written by Erin Johansson
For
years I've been writing that Robert Battista, former chair of the
National Labor Relations Board, has been doing the bidding of
anti-union employers by dismantling protections for workers under the
law. Apparently, he's now going to be doing the bidding of anti-union
employers and making a lot more money at notorious unionbusting firm Littler Mendelson (see a sample of their unionbusting strategies: Littler Mendelson’s Dos & Don’ts).
Battista
asked Bush to withdraw his nomination as Labor Board chair, which was
going nowhere, and joined the firm that John Logan of the London School
of Economics called one of the "nation’s first law firms to conduct aggressive union avoidance campaigns."
Now
Battista can make money telling employers how to exploit the law he
helped to weaken in order to prevent their workers from organizing.
Heres some links on the NLRB in the Bush years
"Today,
fewer workers have fewer rights and weaker remedies under the National
Labor Relations Act," said Liebman, who was appointed to the board by
President Clinton. "Virtually every recent policy choice by the board
impedes collective bargaining, creates obstacles to union
representation or favors employer interests." Unions have
protested what they call anti-union decisions from the current National
Labor Relations Board. They particularly point to 61 decisions the
board made in September they say hurt unionized workers.
"Since
its installation in 2002, the Bush administration's labor board has
embarked on a systematic and insidious effort to radically overhaul our
federal labor law and its regulation of labor relations in the private
sector," AFL-CIO lawyer Jonathan Hiatt said.
If
anti-union employees can get 30 percent of eligible employees to sign a
petition within 45 days, an NLRB secret-ballot election will take
place, the decision said.
"This is an
encouraging step forward for employee freedom," said Stefan Gleason,
vice president of the National Right to Work Foundation.
National
Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation lawyers challenged the
card-check system for workers at two auto parts suppliers, Dana Corp.,
an Ohio auto parts maker and Metaldyne Corp.,of Plymouth, Mich., who
were organized by the United Auto Workers.
The
NLRB, however, said its decision would only apply to future card check
campaigns, leaving the Dana Corp. and Metaldyne Corp. employees as
members of the UAW.
The board's decision
will make it less likely that a company will voluntarily agree to a
card-check campaign, said NLRB members Dennis P. Walsh and Wilma B.
Liebman.
"An employer has little incentive
to recognize a union voluntarily if it knows that its decision is
subject to second-guessing through a decertification petition," the two
wrote.
As Ted Kennedy said:
WASHINGTON,
DC—Today, the White House announced the President’s intent to nominate
Robert Battista and Gerald Morales to the National Labor Relations
Board.
Senator Edward M. Kennedy said, “It’s unbelievable
that President Bush would renominate Mr. Battista to the Board, after
he led the most anti-worker, anti-labor, anti-union Board in its
history. America’s hard-working men and women deserve a Board that will
uphold their rights, not undermine them. With these nominations, the
Administration has again demonstrated its hostility to fairness and
justice in the workplace.”
"This
is not the NLRB. This is George Bush's board. This is Dick Cheney's
board. This is the Chamber of Commerce's board. This is the National
Association of Manufacturers' board. And it sure as hell ain't the
Labor Board!” declared Mine Workers President Cecil Roberts.
The
marchers protested 61 NLRB decisions, virtually all by party-line 3-2
votes, starting in late September and continuing, that stripped away
many workers' rights. They included rulings making it easier to oust
unions through what are called "decertification petitions” -- rulings
making it harder for workers illegally fired for pro-union work to get
back pay, and rulings making it easier for firms to break labor law.
Human
Rights Watch wishes to express our deepest concern that the National
Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision in the so-called Kentucky River Trilogy
violates United States obligations under international human rights law
and international labor law. The decision announces an expanded
definition of “supervisor” under the National Labor Relations Act
(NLRA), the main U.S. law governing workers’ right to organize. Under
the new definition, employers can classify as “supervisors” those
employees with incidental oversight over coworkers, even when such
oversight is far short of genuine managerial or supervisory authority.
Sphere: Related Content
Related Posts by Categories
American Rights at Work
anti-union
Kentucky River
Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Got a story you'd like to see posted here on UR? Please feel free to get a user name and password and share any related information with our growing online community.
login or register
Your donation will help keep UR a strong, vibrant community and a valuable resource for the labor movement.
Find out more about ads and donations on this site.
US Labor News from LabourStart
Joe's Union Review - The Anti-Union Blogspot
|