Submitted by Joe638NYC on Sat, 04/05/2008 - 11:47am.
|
"There will be no punishment for law-breaking employers and they get the bonus of a state-sponsored tool for union busting." -Mark Desetti
Wow, if I didn't read it, I wouldn't believe it.
Kansas,
a state in this United States, has passed a bill through it's Senate
that will exclude punishment for the employers of undocumented workers,
but would fine a union who lets the worker into it's ranks. You got
that? They do not blame the employers, they want to stop anyone from
helping the workers.
This is a tremendous blow to organized
labor. This is a great defeat to workers in the United States. It
encourages more slave labor. More criminal behavior. More dissension
and confusion in our country. More separatism and division.
We are becoming a third world nation, and these multi-national corporations are dragging the entire world down with us.
From Kansas Workbeat :
Kansas Senate Votes to Punish Unions for Illegal Actions of Employers!
By Mark Desetti, Director, Legislative and Political Advocacy of the Kansas National Education Association
The
Kansas Senate adopted an amendment by Senator Karin Brownlee (R-Olathe)
to the immigration reform bill that would put responsibility for
controlling illegal immigration on unions and other employee
organizations.
Under the amendment any union or employee
organization that would “impose or collect union dues from any alien
who is not lawfully present in the United States” would be subject to
fines from $2,000 to $10,000. The amendment was adopted in the wee
hours on a vote of 19 to 18.
It is important to note that the
Senators repeatedly rejected attempts to impose punishments on
employers who knowingly hire illegal aliens. In other words, in Kansas,
while employers are free to do whatever they want when hiring, employee
groups will be punished for fraternizing with other employees.
This
is a new low for the Kansas Senate. A majority of them are happy to
turn a blind eye to the hiring of illegal aliens and will use
immigration reform to bust unions.
So here is the scenario:
- An
employer, knowing that he will not be punished for hiring an illegal,
puts the illegal alien to work side by side with unionized American
workers.
- The union, believing that the employer would not hire
illegal aliens (that is illegal, you know), signs the employee up as a
member of the union.
- The union is now subject to criminal
action and fines even though the union has no ability to verify the
legal status of a worker.
What a boon this will be to union
busting employers! All they have to do is drop in a few illegal aliens,
let the union recruit them, then make sure the union gets reported for
collecting dues. The fines help to bankrupt the union and the employer
gets off free and easy!
Brownlee argued that she was protecting
these workers from “exploitation” by a union that had no intention of
providing them with benefits. Oh, after the union gets caught
“exploiting” the worker saved by this “protection,” the government can
get about the business of deporting him.
This amendment – and
the bill it is on – rise to a new level of hypocrisy. Senators who
claim to want to stop illegal immigration into Kansas do nothing to
remove the primary reason undocumented workers come to this country –
jobs. Employers enjoy the benefit of very low wages payable to illegal
immigrants and they lobbied hard to block any attempt to institute
punishments for employers who knowingly hire illegal workers. They
stand against minimum wage increases that would make jobs more
appealing to citizens. And now their “pro-business” friends in the
Senate have delivered. There will be no punishment for law-breaking
employers and they get the bonus of a state-sponsored tool for union
busting.
The site goes on to list those in favor and against,
19 Republicans voted for the passage, while 8 against. 3 Republicans
did not vote. All 10 Democrats voted against the measure. Go there and
see who doesn't deserve you vote in 2008
I applaud the 10
Democrats and 8 Republicans who stood up against this
anti-union/pro-corporate Legislation. As you can see, most Republicans
are absolutely not for the working class.
Not since the “ Kentucky River"
decision handed down by the Republican-dominated National Labor
Relations Board (NLRB) on Sept. 9th of 2006, which can alienate 8
million workers from being in a union, has there been such an
Anti-Union ruling or law established in these United States.
This is the Third World War, the war against the worker.
Recent headlines about the Kentucky River decision " International Labor Organization condemns "Kentucky River" Decision"
Sphere: Related Content
Related Posts by Categories
2008 election
- AFL-CIO Invites McCain To Its Roundtables
- Debunking Bush's U.S. Trade Representative(USTR) Claims in Defense of NAFTA
- Clinton, McCain, and Obama SILENT on Strike
- If you work in the USA, voting for McCain is a vote against your own interests
- Audio
File Of The Week- WIN Radio- UAW-American Axle strike, WI nurses,
online rally for paid sick days and news about Obama regarding NAFTA
- Censorship, Atheists, Labor, Toxic Toys, Romney, Giuliani, Willie Nelson, 911 conspiracys and other stuff you may have missed
- Ron Paul places 2nd in Nevada GOP caucus, Big Media fails to mention it
- Did unions drop the ball ignoring Edwards?
- Fox edits out Ron Paul in SC debate rebroadcast
- Big Media forcing candidates down our throat as biggest threat to workers and possibly our country gets ignored.
anti-union
immigration
Bookmark/Search this post with:
|
Got a story you'd like to see posted here on UR? Please feel free to get a user name and password and share any related information with our growing online community.
login or register
Your donation will help keep UR a strong, vibrant community and a valuable resource for the labor movement.
Find out more about ads and donations on this site.
US Labor News from LabourStart
Joe's Union Review - The Anti-Union Blogspot
|